Dawesville vs Erskine, WA suburb comparison

Dawesville for beach lifestyle and investment; Erskine for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DawesvilleErskine

Overall score

Dawesville

45.7/100

Erskine

35.9/100

Crime rate

Dawesville

1742.9 / 1k

Erskine

2578.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dawesville

65

Erskine

42

Population

Dawesville

7,143

Erskine

5,429

Metric leadDawesville 8Erskine 1across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDawesvilleErskine
Overall score45.7/10035.9/100
Housing (desirability)34.7/10018.0/100
Crime rate1742.9 / 1k2578.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops3519
Walkability76.0/10055.5/100
Nearby amenities6542
Population7,1435,429
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Dawesville reads as a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone; Erskine is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Where Dawesville is shaped by the coast, Erskine offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Dawesville is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Erskine answers with relatively affordable housing and improving crime trends. Dawesville generally means more sought-after housing, while Erskine leans toward more approachable housing costs.

People chasing a beach lifestyle and investors may find Dawesville the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Erskine.

Related comparisons