Overall score
Dawesville
45.7/100
Erskine
35.9/100
Dawesville for beach lifestyle and investment; Erskine for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Dawesville
45.7/100
Erskine
35.9/100
Crime rate
Dawesville
1742.9 / 1k
Erskine
2578.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dawesville
65
Erskine
42
Population
Dawesville
7,143
Erskine
5,429
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dawesville | Erskine |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.7/100 | 35.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 34.7/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 1742.9 / 1k | 2578.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 19 |
| Walkability | 76.0/100 | 55.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 42 |
| Population | 7,143 | 5,429 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Dawesville reads as a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone; Erskine is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Where Dawesville is shaped by the coast, Erskine offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
On the data, Dawesville is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Erskine answers with relatively affordable housing and improving crime trends. Dawesville generally means more sought-after housing, while Erskine leans toward more approachable housing costs.
People chasing a beach lifestyle and investors may find Dawesville the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Erskine.