Coodanup vs Erskine, WA suburb comparison

Erskine for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoodanupErskine

Overall score

Coodanup

27.1/100

Erskine

35.9/100

Crime rate

Coodanup

3137.6 / 1k

Erskine

2578.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coodanup

60

Erskine

42

Population

Coodanup

4,366

Erskine

5,429

Metric leadCoodanup 2Erskine 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoodanupErskine
Overall score27.1/10035.9/100
Housing (desirability)9.2/10018.0/100
Crime rate3137.6 / 1k2578.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Parks & reserves9
Public transport stops2919
Walkability30.0/10055.5/100
Nearby amenities6042
Population4,3665,429
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Coodanup reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Erskine is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible.

On the data, Coodanup is stronger for public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities; Erskine answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Erskine, while Coodanup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons