Coodanup vs Greenfields, WA Suburb Comparison

Coodanup for families; Greenfields for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoodanupGreenfields

Overall score

Coodanup

27.1/100

Greenfields

40.4/100

Crime rate

Coodanup

59.7 / 1k

Greenfields

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coodanup

79

Greenfields

162

Population

Coodanup

4,366

Greenfields

9,869

Metric leadCoodanup 1Greenfields 83 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoodanupGreenfields
Overall score27.1/10040.4/100
Housing (desirability)50.9/10052.9/100
Crime rate59.7 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools27
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves96
Public transport stops2960
Walkability30.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities79162
Green cover2.3%3.2%
Population4,3669,869
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Coodanup is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Greenfields is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Coodanup pulls ahead on parks and reserves, whereas Greenfields is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Greenfields, while Coodanup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons