Greenfields vs Silver Sands, WA suburb comparison

Greenfields for value; Silver Sands for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GreenfieldsSilver Sands

Overall score

Greenfields

52.0/100

Silver Sands

30.7/100

Crime rate

Greenfields

1432.5 / 1k

Silver Sands

9601.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Greenfields

85

Silver Sands

16

Population

Greenfields

9,869

Silver Sands

1,451

Metric leadGreenfields 8Silver Sands 2across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGreenfieldsSilver Sands
Overall score52.0/10030.7/100
Housing (desirability)21.1/10027.8/100
Crime rate1432.5 / 1k9601.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools73
Parks & reserves61
Public transport stops603
Walkability74.0/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities8516
Population9,8691,451
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Greenfields is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Silver Sands is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Silver Sands is shaped by the coast, Greenfields offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Greenfields is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Silver Sands answers with housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Greenfields generally means more approachable housing costs, while Silver Sands leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Greenfields if you are weighing value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools; lean toward Silver Sands for retirees and families.

Related comparisons