Greenfields vs Silver Sands, WA Suburb Comparison

Greenfields for retirees and investment; Silver Sands for families and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GreenfieldsSilver Sands

Overall score

Greenfields

40.4/100

Silver Sands

33.1/100

Crime rate

Greenfields

59.7 / 1k

Silver Sands

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Greenfields

162

Silver Sands

26

Population

Greenfields

9,869

Silver Sands

1,451

Metric leadGreenfields 9Silver Sands 12 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGreenfieldsSilver Sands
Overall score40.4/10033.1/100
Housing (desirability)52.9/10050.9/100
Crime rate59.7 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools73
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves61
Public transport stops603
Walkability76.0/1006.5/100
Nearby amenities16226
Green cover3.2%1.1%
Population9,8691,451
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Greenfields is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Silver Sands is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Silver Sands is shaped by the coast, Greenfields offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Greenfields is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Silver Sands answers with housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Choose Greenfields if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Silver Sands for retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons