Overall score
Upper Coomera
50.8/100
Devonport
52.1/100
Upper Coomera for families and schools; Devonport for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Upper Coomera
50.8/100
Devonport
52.1/100
Crime rate
Upper Coomera
48.6 / 1k
Devonport
54.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Upper Coomera
173
Devonport
331
Population
Upper Coomera
27,180
Devonport
14,481
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Upper Coomera | Devonport |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.8/100 | 52.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.8/100 | 79.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.6 / 1k | 54.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 34 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 72 | 73 |
| Walkability | 67.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 173 | 331 |
| Green cover | 14.0% | 3.4% |
| Population | 27,180 | 14,481 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Upper Coomera is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, whereas Devonport is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Upper Coomera sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Devonport is further into the wider countryside.
Upper Coomera tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, while Devonport stands out for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability. Upper Coomera generally means more sought-after housing, while Devonport leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Upper Coomera, while Devonport remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.