Overall score
Dickson
59.6/100
Turner
46.7/100
Dickson vs Turner, ACT Suburb Comparison
Dickson for retirees and families; Turner for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
DicksonTurner
Crime rate
Dickson
92.9 / 1k
Turner
31.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dickson
345
Turner
136
Population
Dickson
3,292
Turner
4,470
Metric leadDickson 5Turner 43 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dickson | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.6/100 | 46.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.0/100 | 52.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 92.9 / 1k | 31.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 345 | 136 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 8 |
| Green cover | 4.4% | 7.5% |
| Population | 3,292 | 4,470 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Dickson is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Turner is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Dickson tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability, while Turner stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Dickson, while Turner remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.