Overall score
Douglas Park
50.2/100
Razorback
40.1/100
Douglas Park vs Razorback, NSW suburb comparison
Douglas Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Douglas ParkRazorback
Crime rate
Douglas Park
25.4 / 1k
Razorback
42.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Douglas Park
26
Razorback
5
Population
Douglas Park
1,386
Razorback
1,174
Metric leadDouglas Park 7Razorback 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesDouglas Park
- Best for investmentDouglas Park
- Best for best valueDouglas Park
- Best for best schoolsDouglas Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Douglas Park | Razorback |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.2/100 | 40.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 69.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 25.4 / 1k | 42.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 76 | 54 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 21 |
| Population | 1,386 | 1,174 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Douglas Park is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Razorback is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Douglas Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Razorback is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Douglas Park sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Razorback.
Douglas Park suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Razorback is the stronger match for retirees.