Overall score
Douglas
57.5/100
Thuringowa Central
66.1/100
Thuringowa Central for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Douglas
57.5/100
Thuringowa Central
66.1/100
Crime rate
Douglas
114.3 / 1k
Thuringowa Central
65.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Douglas
167
Thuringowa Central
138
Population
Douglas
7,780
Thuringowa Central
1,953
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Douglas | Thuringowa Central |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.5/100 | 66.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.4/100 | 79.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 114.3 / 1k | 65.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 8 |
| Walkability | 48.5/100 | 70.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 167 | 138 |
| Population | 7,780 | 1,953 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Douglas reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Thuringowa Central is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Douglas tends to lead on parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities, while Thuringowa Central stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Douglas generally means more sought-after housing, while Thuringowa Central leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Households prioritising schools may find Douglas the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Thuringowa Central.