Condon vs Thuringowa Central, QLD Suburb Comparison

Condon for investment; Thuringowa Central for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CondonThuringowa Central

Overall score

Condon

32.2/100

Thuringowa Central

49.5/100

Crime rate

Condon

115.0 / 1k

Thuringowa Central

106.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Condon

19

Thuringowa Central

138

Population

Condon

5,894

Thuringowa Central

1,953

Metric leadCondon 2Thuringowa Central 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCondonThuringowa Central
Overall score32.2/10049.5/100
Housing (desirability)61.1/10051.8/100
Crime rate115.0 / 1k106.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)19.8/10019.8/100
Parks & reserves48
Walkability3.5/10070.0/100
Nearby amenities19138
Green cover2.9%15.7%
Population5,8941,953
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Condon reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Thuringowa Central is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

On the data, Condon is stronger for a larger local community; Thuringowa Central answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. On housing, Condon sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Thuringowa Central.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Thuringowa Central, while Condon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons