Overall score
Condon
32.2/100
Rasmussen
32.5/100
Condon vs Rasmussen, QLD Suburb Comparison
Condon for investment and value; Rasmussen for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CondonRasmussen
Crime rate
Condon
115.0 / 1k
Rasmussen
114.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Condon
19
Rasmussen
33
Population
Condon
5,894
Rasmussen
4,669
Metric leadCondon 4Rasmussen 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Condon | Rasmussen |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.2/100 | 32.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.1/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 115.0 / 1k | 114.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 19.8/100 | 19.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 10 |
| Walkability | 3.5/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 19 | 33 |
| Green cover | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Population | 5,894 | 4,669 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Condon is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Rasmussen is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Condon tends to lead on housing affordability, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Rasmussen stands out for parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Condon, while Rasmussen remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.