Condon vs Rasmussen, QLD suburb comparison

Condon for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CondonRasmussen

Overall score

Condon

39.2/100

Rasmussen

45.3/100

Crime rate

Condon

68.2 / 1k

Rasmussen

68.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Condon

19

Rasmussen

34

Population

Condon

5,894

Rasmussen

4,669

Metric leadCondon 3Rasmussen 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCondonRasmussen
Overall score39.2/10045.3/100
Housing (desirability)75.3/10065.0/100
Crime rate68.2 / 1k68.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Parks & reserves410
Walkability3.5/10046.0/100
Nearby amenities1934
Population5,8944,669
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Condon is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Rasmussen is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Condon tends to lead on housing affordability and a larger local community, while Rasmussen stands out for parks and reserves and walkability.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Condon, while Rasmussen remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons