Overall score
Douglas
45.6/100
Kelso
24.1/100
Douglas for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Douglas
45.6/100
Kelso
24.1/100
Crime rate
Douglas
184.2 / 1k
Kelso
116.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Douglas
168
Kelso
8
Population
Douglas
7,780
Kelso
10,599
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Douglas | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.6/100 | 24.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.8/100 | 46.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 184.2 / 1k | 116.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 19.8/100 | 19.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 11 |
| Walkability | 46.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 168 | 8 |
| Green cover | 9.8% | 2.5% |
| Population | 7,780 | 10,599 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 2/10 |
Douglas reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Kelso is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Douglas pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability, whereas Kelso is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a larger local community. Douglas generally means more sought-after housing, while Kelso leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Douglas, while Kelso remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.