Overall score
Dover Gardens
48.6/100
Seacliff Park
56.1/100
Seacliff Park for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Dover Gardens
48.6/100
Seacliff Park
56.1/100
Crime rate
Dover Gardens
27.3 / 1k
Seacliff Park
38.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dover Gardens
45
Seacliff Park
39
Population
Dover Gardens
3,062
Seacliff Park
2,644
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dover Gardens | Seacliff Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.6/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 41.1/100 | 64.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.3 / 1k | 38.8 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 17 |
| Walkability | 27.5/100 | 69.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 45 | 39 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 39 |
| Population | 3,062 | 2,644 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Dover Gardens is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Seacliff Park is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city.
On the data, Dover Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities; Seacliff Park answers with housing affordability and walkability.
On balance, value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Seacliff Park, while Dover Gardens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.