Driver vs Farrar, NT suburb comparison

Driver for families and schools; Farrar for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DriverFarrar

Overall score

Driver

43.6/100

Farrar

35.2/100

Nearby amenities

Driver

41

Farrar

34

Population

Driver

2,747

Farrar

1,650

Metric leadDriver 7Farrar 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDriverFarrar
Overall score43.6/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)14.1/10031.4/100
Schools & preschools61
Parks & reserves43
Public transport stops158
Walkability26.5/10012.0/100
Nearby amenities4134
Population2,7471,650
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Driver reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Farrar is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.

On the data, Driver is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Farrar answers with housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Driver sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Farrar.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Farrar, while Driver remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons