Drummond Cove vs Waggrakine, WA Suburb Comparison

Drummond Cove for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Drummond CoveWaggrakine

Overall score

Drummond Cove

37.5/100

Waggrakine

25.2/100

Crime rate

Drummond Cove

132.8 / 1k

Waggrakine

132.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Drummond Cove

26

Waggrakine

4

Population

Drummond Cove

1,605

Waggrakine

2,679

Metric leadDrummond Cove 7Waggrakine 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDrummond CoveWaggrakine
Overall score37.5/10025.2/100
Housing (desirability)41.2/10042.5/100
Crime rate132.8 / 1k132.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)2.8/1002.8/100
Parks & reserves101
Public transport stops2018
Walkability30.0/10027.0/100
Nearby amenities264
Green cover8.2%0.7%
Population1,6052,679
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Drummond Cove reads as a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Waggrakine is a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace. Drummond Cove leans into coastal living, while Waggrakine feels more inland and suburban in character.

Drummond Cove tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Waggrakine stands out for a larger local community. Drummond Cove generally means more sought-after housing, while Waggrakine leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Drummond Cove, while Waggrakine remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons