Durack vs Farrar, NT suburb comparison

Durack for families and value; Farrar for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DurackFarrar

Overall score

Durack

50.1/100

Farrar

35.2/100

Nearby amenities

Durack

62

Farrar

34

Population

Durack

3,730

Farrar

1,650

Metric leadDurack 8Farrar 1across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDurackFarrar
Overall score50.1/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)27.6/10031.4/100
Schools & preschools21
Parks & reserves103
Public transport stops158
Walkability39.5/10012.0/100
Nearby amenities6234
Population3,7301,650
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Durack reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Farrar is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.

Durack tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Farrar stands out for housing affordability. Durack generally means more sought-after housing, while Farrar leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Durack suits families and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Farrar is the stronger match for investors.

Related comparisons