Overall score
Dysart
34.4/100
Oatlands
35.9/100
Dysart vs Oatlands, TAS Suburb Comparison
Dysart for value; Oatlands for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
DysartOatlands
Crime rate
Dysart
71.1 / 1k
Oatlands
71.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dysart
7
Oatlands
8
Population
Dysart
252
Oatlands
728
Metric leadDysart 3Oatlands 43 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dysart | Oatlands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.4/100 | 35.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.8/100 | 56.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 71.1 / 1k | 71.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 8 |
| Green cover | 17.1% | 12.1% |
| Population | 252 | 728 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Dysart is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Oatlands is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
Dysart tends to lead on housing affordability, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Oatlands stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
Choose Dysart if you are weighing retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Oatlands for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.