Echunga vs Meadows, SA suburb comparison

Echunga for retirees and schools; Meadows for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EchungaMeadows

Overall score

Echunga

52.3/100

Meadows

55.9/100

Crime rate

Echunga

9.3 / 1k

Meadows

8.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Echunga

25

Meadows

50

Population

Echunga

1,219

Meadows

1,717

Metric leadEchunga 3Meadows 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEchungaMeadows
Overall score52.3/10055.9/100
Housing (desirability)74.6/10091.7/100
Crime rate9.3 / 1k8.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Public transport stops125
Walkability20.0/10032.5/100
Nearby amenities2550
Planning activity1631
Population1,2191,717
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Echunga is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Meadows is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Echunga sits among greener hillside streets, while Meadows keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Echunga pulls ahead on public transport access and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Meadows is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Echunga if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Meadows for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons