Edmonton vs Mount Peter, QLD suburb comparison

Edmonton for value; Mount Peter for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EdmontonMount Peter

Overall score

Edmonton

61.8/100

Mount Peter

36.0/100

Crime rate

Edmonton

78.1 / 1k

Mount Peter

78.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Edmonton

95

Mount Peter

0

Population

Edmonton

11,409

Mount Peter

689

Metric leadEdmonton 6Mount Peter 11 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEdmontonMount Peter
Overall score61.8/10036.0/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10091.7/100
Crime rate78.1 / 1k78.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Parks & reserves15
Walkability66.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities950
Population11,409689
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Edmonton is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Mount Peter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Peter sits among greener hillside streets, while Edmonton keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Edmonton pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Mount Peter is the better pick for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Edmonton generally means more approachable housing costs, while Mount Peter leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Choose Edmonton if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Mount Peter for retirees and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons