Overall score
Gordonvale
54.8/100
Mount Peter
36.0/100
Gordonvale for families; Mount Peter for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gordonvale
54.8/100
Mount Peter
36.0/100
Crime rate
Gordonvale
47.6 / 1k
Mount Peter
78.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gordonvale
34
Mount Peter
0
Population
Gordonvale
6,944
Mount Peter
689
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gordonvale | Mount Peter |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.8/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 73.3/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.6 / 1k | 78.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | — |
| Walkability | 36.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 34 | 0 |
| Population | 6,944 | 689 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Gordonvale is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Mount Peter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Peter sits among greener hillside streets, while Gordonvale keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Gordonvale tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Mount Peter stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Gordonvale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Mount Peter leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Choose Gordonvale if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Mount Peter for retirees and investors.