Gordonvale vs Mount Peter, QLD Suburb Comparison

Gordonvale for retirees; Mount Peter for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GordonvaleMount Peter

Overall score

Gordonvale

38.5/100

Mount Peter

35.0/100

Crime rate

Gordonvale

71.6 / 1k

Mount Peter

123.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gordonvale

33

Mount Peter

0

Population

Gordonvale

6,944

Mount Peter

689

Metric leadGordonvale 6Mount Peter 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGordonvaleMount Peter
Overall score38.5/10035.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.9/10053.2/100
Crime rate71.6 / 1k123.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools41
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves6—
Walkability36.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities330
Green cover8.0%37.2%
Population6,944689
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gordonvale is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Mount Peter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Peter sits among greener hillside streets, while Gordonvale keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Gordonvale tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability, while Mount Peter stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Gordonvale generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Peter leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Choose Gordonvale if you are weighing families; lean toward Mount Peter for investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons