Overall score
Gordonvale
54.8/100
Little Mulgrave
27.8/100
Gordonvale for retirees and investment; Little Mulgrave for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gordonvale
54.8/100
Little Mulgrave
27.8/100
Crime rate
Gordonvale
47.6 / 1k
Little Mulgrave
46.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gordonvale
34
Little Mulgrave
2
Population
Gordonvale
6,944
Little Mulgrave
269
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gordonvale | Little Mulgrave |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.8/100 | 27.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 73.3/100 | 33.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 47.6 / 1k | 46.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | — |
| Walkability | 36.5/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 34 | 2 |
| Population | 6,944 | 269 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Gordonvale is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Little Mulgrave is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Gordonvale is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Little Mulgrave answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Gordonvale sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Little Mulgrave.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gordonvale, while Little Mulgrave remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.