Overall score
Aloomba
34.0/100
Little Mulgrave
27.8/100
Aloomba vs Little Mulgrave, QLD suburb comparison
Aloomba for retirees and investment; Little Mulgrave for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AloombaLittle Mulgrave
Crime rate
Aloomba
43.6 / 1k
Little Mulgrave
46.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aloomba
0
Little Mulgrave
2
Population
Aloomba
576
Little Mulgrave
269
Metric leadAloomba 4Little Mulgrave 3across 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesAloomba
- Best for familiesLittle Mulgrave
- Best for investmentAloomba
- Best for best valueAloomba
- Best for best schoolsAloomba
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aloomba | Little Mulgrave |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.0/100 | 27.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.0/100 | 33.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.6 / 1k | 46.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 2 |
| Population | 576 | 269 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Aloomba reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Little Mulgrave is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Aloomba tends to lead on housing affordability and overall desirability, while Little Mulgrave stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.
Retirees and investors may find Aloomba the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Little Mulgrave.