Edmonton vs Little Mulgrave, QLD suburb comparison

Edmonton for investment and value; Little Mulgrave for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EdmontonLittle Mulgrave

Overall score

Edmonton

61.8/100

Little Mulgrave

27.8/100

Crime rate

Edmonton

78.1 / 1k

Little Mulgrave

46.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Edmonton

95

Little Mulgrave

2

Population

Edmonton

11,409

Little Mulgrave

269

Metric leadEdmonton 5Little Mulgrave 2across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEdmontonLittle Mulgrave
Overall score61.8/10027.8/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10033.3/100
Crime rate78.1 / 1k46.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools4
Parks & reserves15
Walkability66.5/1002.0/100
Nearby amenities952
Population11,409269
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Edmonton is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Little Mulgrave is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Edmonton is stronger for housing affordability and walkability; Little Mulgrave answers with a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Edmonton generally means more approachable housing costs, while Little Mulgrave leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Edmonton the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Little Mulgrave.

Related comparisons