Overall score
Aloomba
34.1/100
Gordonvale
54.7/100
Aloomba for investment; Gordonvale for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Aloomba
34.1/100
Gordonvale
54.7/100
Crime rate
Aloomba
41.9 / 1k
Gordonvale
46.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Aloomba
0
Gordonvale
34
Population
Aloomba
576
Gordonvale
6,944
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Aloomba | Gordonvale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.1/100 | 54.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.0/100 | 73.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.9 / 1k | 46.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 6 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 36.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 34 |
| Population | 576 | 6,944 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Aloomba reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Gordonvale is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Aloomba tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Gordonvale stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Aloomba sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Gordonvale.
Investors may find Aloomba the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Gordonvale.