Overall score
Edwardstown
39.4/100
Glandore
45.3/100
Edwardstown vs Glandore, SA Suburb Comparison
Edwardstown for investment; Glandore for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
EdwardstownGlandore
Crime rate
Edwardstown
139.7 / 1k
Glandore
48.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Edwardstown
201
Glandore
149
Population
Edwardstown
4,514
Glandore
3,041
Metric leadEdwardstown 5Glandore 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesGlandore
- Best for familiesGlandore
- Best for investmentEdwardstown
- Best for best schoolsGlandore
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Edwardstown | Glandore |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.4/100 | 45.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.4/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 139.7 / 1k | 48.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 17 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 56.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 201 | 149 |
| Planning activity | 62 | 35 |
| Green cover | 0.3% | 2.4% |
| Population | 4,514 | 3,041 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Edwardstown is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Glandore is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Edwardstown tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, while Glandore stands out for a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and overall desirability.
Edwardstown suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Glandore is the stronger match for retirees and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.