Eight Mile Plains vs Upper Mount Gravatt, QLD Suburb Comparison

Eight Mile Plains for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Eight Mile PlainsUpper Mount Gravatt

Overall score

Eight Mile Plains

65.8/100

Upper Mount Gravatt

57.8/100

Crime rate

Eight Mile Plains

37.4 / 1k

Upper Mount Gravatt

97.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Eight Mile Plains

746

Upper Mount Gravatt

414

Population

Eight Mile Plains

15,326

Upper Mount Gravatt

10,800

Metric leadEight Mile Plains 8Upper Mount Gravatt 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEight Mile PlainsUpper Mount Gravatt
Overall score65.8/10057.8/100
Housing (desirability)53.6/10050.8/100
Crime rate37.4 / 1k97.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools19
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves2811
Public transport stops4784
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities746414
Green cover14.6%6.1%
Population15,32610,800
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Eight Mile Plains is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Upper Mount Gravatt is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Upper Mount Gravatt sits among greener hillside streets, while Eight Mile Plains keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Eight Mile Plains tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, while Upper Mount Gravatt stands out for schools and education options, plus public transport access.

Retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Eight Mile Plains the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Upper Mount Gravatt.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons