Overall score
Eleebana
56.1/100
Marmong Point
39.9/100
Eleebana vs Marmong Point, NSW Suburb Comparison
Eleebana for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
EleebanaMarmong Point
Crime rate
Eleebana
36.9 / 1k
Marmong Point
90.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Eleebana
92
Marmong Point
19
Population
Eleebana
6,460
Marmong Point
765
Metric leadEleebana 9Marmong Point 31 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Eleebana | Marmong Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.1/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.6/100 | 72.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 36.9 / 1k | 90.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 160 | 9 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 15.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 92 | 19 |
| Planning activity | 29 | 8 |
| Green cover | 6.1% | 1.8% |
| Population | 6,460 | 765 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Eleebana is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Marmong Point is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Eleebana sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Marmong Point is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Eleebana is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Marmong Point answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Eleebana if you are weighing retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Marmong Point for investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.