Overall score
Elizabeth Town
38.4/100
Mole Creek
36.3/100
Elizabeth Town vs Mole Creek, TAS Suburb Comparison
Elizabeth Town for value; Mole Creek for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Elizabeth TownMole Creek
Crime rate
Elizabeth Town
18.3 / 1k
Mole Creek
18.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Elizabeth Town
8
Mole Creek
38
Population
Elizabeth Town
299
Mole Creek
528
Metric leadElizabeth Town 4Mole Creek 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for best valueElizabeth Town
- Best for best schoolsMole Creek
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Elizabeth Town | Mole Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.4/100 | 36.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.2/100 | 61.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.3 / 1k | 18.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 49.1/100 | 49.1/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 38 |
| Green cover | 5.9% | 3.0% |
| Population | 299 | 528 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Elizabeth Town is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Mole Creek is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Elizabeth Town tends to lead on housing affordability, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Mole Creek stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
Elizabeth Town suits families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mole Creek is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.