Overall score
Epsom
60.0/100
White Hills
56.4/100
Epsom for investment and value; White Hills for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Epsom
60.0/100
White Hills
56.4/100
Crime rate
Epsom
90.8 / 1k
White Hills
60.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Epsom
89
White Hills
70
Population
Epsom
5,014
White Hills
3,620
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Epsom | White Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.0/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 83.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 90.8 / 1k | 60.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 31 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 70 |
| Planning activity | 52 | 55 |
| Population | 5,014 | 3,620 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Put side by side, Epsom is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and White Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. White Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Epsom keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Epsom pulls ahead on housing affordability and public transport access, whereas White Hills is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Epsom generally means more mid-market housing value, while White Hills leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Epsom suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas White Hills is the stronger match for retirees and families.