Epsom vs White Hills, VIC suburb comparison

Epsom for investment and value; White Hills for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EpsomWhite Hills

Overall score

Epsom

60.0/100

White Hills

56.4/100

Crime rate

Epsom

90.8 / 1k

White Hills

60.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Epsom

89

White Hills

70

Population

Epsom

5,014

White Hills

3,620

Metric leadEpsom 8White Hills 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEpsomWhite Hills
Overall score60.0/10056.4/100
Housing (desirability)88.3/10083.2/100
Crime rate90.8 / 1k60.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops4431
Walkability80.0/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities8970
Planning activity5255
Population5,0143,620
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Epsom is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and White Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. White Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Epsom keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Epsom pulls ahead on housing affordability and public transport access, whereas White Hills is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Epsom generally means more mid-market housing value, while White Hills leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Epsom suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas White Hills is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons