Overall score
Epsom
60.0/100
Jackass Flat
44.4/100
Epsom vs Jackass Flat, VIC suburb comparison
Epsom for investment and value; Jackass Flat for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
EpsomJackass Flat
Crime rate
Epsom
90.8 / 1k
Jackass Flat
32.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Epsom
89
Jackass Flat
15
Population
Epsom
5,014
Jackass Flat
1,907
Metric leadEpsom 6Jackass Flat 22 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesJackass Flat
- Best for familiesJackass Flat
- Best for investmentEpsom
- Best for best valueEpsom
- Best for best schoolsEpsom
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Epsom | Jackass Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.0/100 | 44.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 80.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 90.8 / 1k | 32.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 8 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 12.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 15 |
| Planning activity | 52 | 14 |
| Population | 5,014 | 1,907 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Epsom is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Jackass Flat is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Epsom tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Jackass Flat stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Epsom if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Jackass Flat for retirees and families.