Overall score
Epsom
45.7/100
White Hills
48.4/100
White Hills for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Epsom
45.7/100
White Hills
48.4/100
Crime rate
Epsom
90.8 / 1k
White Hills
60.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Epsom
107
White Hills
78
Population
Epsom
5,014
White Hills
3,620
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Epsom | White Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.7/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.2/100 | 71.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 90.8 / 1k | 60.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 53.4/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 44 | 31 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 107 | 78 |
| Planning activity | 52 | 55 |
| Green cover | 11.4% | 11.8% |
| Population | 5,014 | 3,620 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Put side by side, Epsom is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and White Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. White Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Epsom keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Epsom pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas White Hills is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Epsom generally means more mid-market housing value, while White Hills leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Epsom suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas White Hills is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.