Overall score
Eureka
42.7/100
Soldiers Hill
48.9/100
Eureka for retirees and families; Soldiers Hill for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Eureka
42.7/100
Soldiers Hill
48.9/100
Crime rate
Eureka
122.4 / 1k
Soldiers Hill
190.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Eureka
51
Soldiers Hill
82
Population
Eureka
633
Soldiers Hill
2,813
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Eureka | Soldiers Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.7/100 | 48.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 68.4/100 | 69.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 122.4 / 1k | 190.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 13 |
| Walkability | 9.0/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 51 | 82 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 83 |
| Green cover | 14.8% | 1.4% |
| Population | 633 | 2,813 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 7/10 |
Eureka reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Soldiers Hill is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Eureka pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Soldiers Hill is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Eureka generally means more approachable housing costs, while Soldiers Hill leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Soldiers Hill, while Eureka remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.