Overall score
Evanston Gardens
30.2/100
Evanston South
28.4/100
Evanston Gardens for retirees and investment; Evanston South for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Evanston Gardens
30.2/100
Evanston South
28.4/100
Crime rate
Evanston Gardens
54.3 / 1k
Evanston South
56.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Evanston Gardens
40
Evanston South
20
Population
Evanston Gardens
2,347
Evanston South
765
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Evanston Gardens | Evanston South |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.2/100 | 28.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.5/100 | 34.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.3 / 1k | 56.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 11 | 2 |
| Walkability | 16.5/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 40 | 20 |
| Planning activity | 60 | 11 |
| Green cover | 0.9% | 3.3% |
| Population | 2,347 | 765 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Evanston Gardens is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Evanston South is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Evanston Gardens sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Evanston South is further out with more breathing room.
Evanston Gardens pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, whereas Evanston South is the better pick for tree cover and green space, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Evanston Gardens suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Evanston South is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.