Overall score
Everard Park
39.7/100
Unley
59.0/100
Everard Park vs Unley, SA Suburb Comparison
Everard Park for schools; Unley for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Everard ParkUnley
Crime rate
Everard Park
63.4 / 1k
Unley
68.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Everard Park
53
Unley
329
Population
Everard Park
1,071
Unley
3,997
Metric leadEverard Park 3Unley 8across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesUnley
- Best for familiesUnley
- Best for investmentUnley
- Best for best valueUnley
- Best for best schoolsEverard Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Everard Park | Unley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.7/100 | 59.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.4/100 | 56.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 63.4 / 1k | 68.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 20 |
| Walkability | 13.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 53 | 329 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 77 |
| Green cover | 0.6% | 3.4% |
| Population | 1,071 | 3,997 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Everard Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Unley is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Everard Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Unley stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.
Everard Park suits families, investors, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Unley is the stronger match for retirees and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.