Overall score
Eyre
38.3/100
Macdonald Park
22.9/100
Eyre for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Eyre
38.3/100
Macdonald Park
22.9/100
Crime rate
Eyre
64.4 / 1k
Macdonald Park
61.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Eyre
40
Macdonald Park
1
Population
Eyre
1,113
Macdonald Park
503
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Eyre | Macdonald Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.3/100 | 22.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.4 / 1k | 61.9 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 7 | — |
| Walkability | 12.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 40 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 61 | 11 |
| Population | 1,113 | 503 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Eyre is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while Macdonald Park is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Eyre sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Macdonald Park is further out with more breathing room.
Eyre tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while Macdonald Park stands out for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Eyre sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Macdonald Park.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Eyre, while Macdonald Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.