Overall score
Andrews Farm
51.3/100
Eyre
38.3/100
Andrews Farm for families and value; Eyre for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Andrews Farm
51.3/100
Eyre
38.3/100
Crime rate
Andrews Farm
41.4 / 1k
Eyre
64.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Andrews Farm
54
Eyre
40
Population
Andrews Farm
8,699
Eyre
1,113
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Andrews Farm | Eyre |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.3/100 | 38.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.4 / 1k | 64.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 7 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 12.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 40 |
| Planning activity | 149 | 61 |
| Population | 8,699 | 1,113 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 3/10 |
Andrews Farm reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Eyre is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible.
Andrews Farm tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Eyre stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Andrews Farm suits families and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Eyre is the stronger match for investors.