Fadden vs Gilmore, ACT suburb comparison

Fadden for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FaddenGilmore

Overall score

Fadden

60.2/100

Gilmore

46.0/100

Crime rate

Fadden

8.0 / 1k

Gilmore

16.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fadden

223

Gilmore

35

Population

Fadden

3,006

Gilmore

2,706

Metric leadFadden 7Gilmore 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFaddenGilmore
Overall score60.2/10046.0/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate8.0 / 1k16.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Parks & reserves3
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities22335
Planning activity34
Population3,0062,706
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fadden is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Gilmore is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city.

Fadden pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Gilmore is the better pick for walkability.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Fadden, while Gilmore remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons