Fairfield vs Stones Corner, QLD suburb comparison

Fairfield for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FairfieldStones Corner

Overall score

Fairfield

71.8/100

Stones Corner

55.5/100

Crime rate

Fairfield

64.5 / 1k

Stones Corner

65.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fairfield

250

Stones Corner

232

Population

Fairfield

3,106

Stones Corner

2,336

Metric leadFairfield 7Stones Corner 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFairfieldStones Corner
Overall score71.8/10055.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/1009.7/100
Crime rate64.5 / 1k65.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools915
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops3021
Walkability92.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities250232
Population3,1062,336
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Fairfield reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Stones Corner is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.

Fairfield tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Stones Corner stands out for walkability.

Fairfield suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Stones Corner is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons