Norman Park vs Stones Corner, QLD Suburb Comparison

Norman Park for investment and value; Stones Corner for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Norman ParkStones Corner

Overall score

Norman Park

59.4/100

Stones Corner

61.5/100

Crime rate

Norman Park

66.1 / 1k

Stones Corner

104.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Norman Park

121

Stones Corner

264

Population

Norman Park

6,842

Stones Corner

2,336

Metric leadNorman Park 4Stones Corner 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNorman ParkStones Corner
Overall score59.4/10061.5/100
Housing (desirability)46.5/10051.1/100
Crime rate66.1 / 1k104.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1015
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops2921
Walkability88.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities121264
Green cover6.8%16.1%
Population6,8422,336
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Norman Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Stones Corner is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Norman Park is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Stones Corner answers with schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Norman Park if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Stones Corner for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons