Camp Hill vs Norman Park, QLD Suburb Comparison

Camp Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Camp HillNorman Park

Overall score

Camp Hill

70.6/100

Norman Park

59.4/100

Crime rate

Camp Hill

41.4 / 1k

Norman Park

66.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Camp Hill

266

Norman Park

121

Population

Camp Hill

12,254

Norman Park

6,842

Metric leadCamp Hill 8Norman Park 13 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCamp HillNorman Park
Overall score70.6/10059.4/100
Housing (desirability)57.8/10046.5/100
Crime rate41.4 / 1k66.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1010
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves57
Public transport stops4729
Walkability100.0/10088.0/100
Nearby amenities266121
Green cover13.0%6.8%
Population12,2546,842
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Camp Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Norman Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Camp Hill pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, whereas Norman Park is the better pick for parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Camp Hill, while Norman Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons