Overall score
Camp Hill
81.1/100
Norman Park
60.0/100
Camp Hill vs Norman Park, QLD suburb comparison
Camp Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Camp HillNorman Park
Crime rate
Camp Hill
24.6 / 1k
Norman Park
40.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camp Hill
263
Norman Park
117
Population
Camp Hill
12,254
Norman Park
6,842
Metric leadCamp Hill 7Norman Park 12 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camp Hill | Norman Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 81.1/100 | 60.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 30.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 24.6 / 1k | 40.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 47 | 29 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 88.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 263 | 117 |
| Population | 12,254 | 6,842 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Camp Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Norman Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Camp Hill pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Norman Park is the better pick for parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Camp Hill, while Norman Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.