Fassifern vs Marmong Point, NSW suburb comparison

Fassifern for families and value; Marmong Point for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FassifernMarmong Point

Overall score

Fassifern

32.9/100

Marmong Point

30.8/100

Crime rate

Fassifern

81.5 / 1k

Marmong Point

90.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fassifern

21

Marmong Point

18

Population

Fassifern

586

Marmong Point

765

Metric leadFassifern 7Marmong Point 3across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFassifernMarmong Point
Overall score32.9/10030.8/100
Housing (desirability)74.0/10065.9/100
Crime rate81.5 / 1k90.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools35
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops209
Walkability30.0/10015.5/100
Nearby amenities2118
Planning activity48
Population586765
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fassifern is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Marmong Point is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.

On the data, Fassifern is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Marmong Point answers with a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Fassifern generally means more approachable housing costs, while Marmong Point leans toward more sought-after housing.

Fassifern suits families and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Marmong Point is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons