Overall score
Fassifern
32.9/100
Marmong Point
30.8/100
Fassifern for families and value; Marmong Point for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fassifern
32.9/100
Marmong Point
30.8/100
Crime rate
Fassifern
81.5 / 1k
Marmong Point
90.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fassifern
21
Marmong Point
18
Population
Fassifern
586
Marmong Point
765
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fassifern | Marmong Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.9/100 | 30.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.0/100 | 65.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 81.5 / 1k | 90.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 20 | 9 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 15.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 21 | 18 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 8 |
| Population | 586 | 765 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Fassifern is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Marmong Point is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
On the data, Fassifern is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Marmong Point answers with a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Fassifern generally means more approachable housing costs, while Marmong Point leans toward more sought-after housing.
Fassifern suits families and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Marmong Point is the stronger match for retirees and investors.