Felixstow vs St Peters, SA suburb comparison

Felixstow for families and schools; St Peters for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FelixstowSt Peters

Overall score

Felixstow

48.4/100

St Peters

48.4/100

Crime rate

Felixstow

36.0 / 1k

St Peters

54.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Felixstow

104

St Peters

145

Population

Felixstow

2,477

St Peters

3,231

Metric leadFelixstow 5St Peters 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFelixstowSt Peters
Overall score48.4/10048.4/100
Housing (desirability)21.9/10018.2/100
Crime rate36.0 / 1k54.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools61
Public transport stops1814
Walkability35.0/10050.0/100
Nearby amenities104145
Planning activity2238
Population2,4773,231
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Felixstow is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and St Peters is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Felixstow pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas St Peters is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Felixstow the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer St Peters.

Related comparisons