Firle vs St Peters, SA suburb comparison

Firle for families and schools; St Peters for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FirleSt Peters

Overall score

Firle

47.0/100

St Peters

48.4/100

Crime rate

Firle

88.2 / 1k

St Peters

54.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Firle

86

St Peters

145

Population

Firle

1,508

St Peters

3,231

Metric leadFirle 3St Peters 6across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFirleSt Peters
Overall score47.0/10048.4/100
Housing (desirability)18.3/10018.2/100
Crime rate88.2 / 1k54.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops1314
Walkability89.5/10050.0/100
Nearby amenities86145
Planning activity1838
Population1,5083,231
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Firle reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; St Peters is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Firle pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas St Peters is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Firle the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer St Peters.

Related comparisons