Overall score
Firle
48.4/100
Kensington
41.4/100
Firle for families and schools; Kensington for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Firle
48.4/100
Kensington
41.4/100
Crime rate
Firle
94.4 / 1k
Kensington
40.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Firle
86
Kensington
79
Population
Firle
1,508
Kensington
1,808
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Firle | Kensington |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.4/100 | 41.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.3/100 | 21.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.4 / 1k | 40.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 8 |
| Walkability | 89.5/100 | 20.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 86 | 79 |
| Planning activity | 18 | 18 |
| Population | 1,508 | 1,808 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Firle is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, and Kensington is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Firle tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Kensington stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Firle suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Kensington is the stronger match for retirees and families.