Fern Tree vs Mount Nelson, TAS Suburb Comparison

Fern Tree for value; Mount Nelson for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fern TreeMount Nelson

Overall score

Fern Tree

43.3/100

Mount Nelson

48.6/100

Crime rate

Fern Tree

87.2 / 1k

Mount Nelson

87.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fern Tree

31

Mount Nelson

93

Population

Fern Tree

763

Mount Nelson

2,749

Metric leadFern Tree 2Mount Nelson 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFern TreeMount Nelson
Overall score43.3/10048.6/100
Housing (desirability)66.8/10056.1/100
Crime rate87.2 / 1k87.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools—4
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops1636
Walkability26.0/10045.0/100
Nearby amenities3193
Green cover0.1%1.1%
Population7632,749
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Fern Tree reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Mount Nelson is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Nelson sits among greener hillside streets, while Fern Tree keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Fern Tree is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Mount Nelson answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

Fern Tree suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Nelson is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons