Overall score
Fern Tree
43.3/100
Mount Nelson
48.6/100
Fern Tree for value; Mount Nelson for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fern Tree
43.3/100
Mount Nelson
48.6/100
Crime rate
Fern Tree
87.2 / 1k
Mount Nelson
87.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fern Tree
31
Mount Nelson
93
Population
Fern Tree
763
Mount Nelson
2,749
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fern Tree | Mount Nelson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.3/100 | 48.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.8/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.2 / 1k | 87.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 36 |
| Walkability | 26.0/100 | 45.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 31 | 93 |
| Green cover | 0.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 763 | 2,749 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Fern Tree reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Mount Nelson is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Nelson sits among greener hillside streets, while Fern Tree keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Fern Tree is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Mount Nelson answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.
Fern Tree suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Nelson is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.