Floreat vs Wembley, WA Suburb Comparison

Floreat for families and value; Wembley for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FloreatWembley

Overall score

Floreat

60.9/100

Wembley

53.9/100

Crime rate

Floreat

96.4 / 1k

Wembley

96.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Floreat

681

Wembley

328

Population

Floreat

8,621

Wembley

12,061

Metric leadFloreat 4Wembley 53 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFloreatWembley
Overall score60.9/10053.9/100
Housing (desirability)40.3/10051.2/100
Crime rate96.4 / 1k96.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops6953
Walkability96.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities681328
Green cover20.4%23.8%
Population8,62112,061
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Floreat is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Wembley is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Floreat tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Wembley stands out for schools and education options, walkability, and a larger local community.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Floreat, while Wembley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons