Forest Grove vs Margaret River, WA Suburb Comparison

Margaret River for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Forest GroveMargaret River

Overall score

Forest Grove

41.3/100

Margaret River

42.7/100

Crime rate

Forest Grove

51.2 / 1k

Margaret River

51.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forest Grove

3

Margaret River

19

Population

Forest Grove

253

Margaret River

8,918

Metric leadForest Grove 2Margaret River 62 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForest GroveMargaret River
Overall score41.3/10042.7/100
Housing (desirability)45.8/10039.6/100
Crime rate51.2 / 1k51.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)63.3/10063.3/100
Parks & reserves3
Public transport stops1
Walkability0.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities319
Green cover31.0%13.8%
Population2538,918
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/106/10

Comparison summary

Forest Grove is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Margaret River is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Forest Grove pulls ahead on a country-town feel and improving crime trends, whereas Margaret River is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Margaret River, while Forest Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons