Overall score
Forest Grove
41.3/100
Margaret River
42.7/100
Margaret River for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forest Grove
41.3/100
Margaret River
42.7/100
Crime rate
Forest Grove
51.2 / 1k
Margaret River
51.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Grove
3
Margaret River
19
Population
Forest Grove
253
Margaret River
8,918
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Grove | Margaret River |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.3/100 | 42.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.8/100 | 39.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 51.2 / 1k | 51.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 63.3/100 | 63.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 19 |
| Green cover | 31.0% | 13.8% |
| Population | 253 | 8,918 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Forest Grove is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Margaret River is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Forest Grove pulls ahead on a country-town feel and improving crime trends, whereas Margaret River is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Margaret River, while Forest Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.