Overall score
Forrest
55.9/100
Hughes
62.0/100
Forrest vs Hughes, ACT Suburb Comparison
Hughes for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ForrestHughes
Crime rate
Forrest
11.7 / 1k
Hughes
8.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forrest
122
Hughes
69
Population
Forrest
1,827
Hughes
3,210
Metric leadForrest 2Hughes 73 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forrest | Hughes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.9/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.9/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.7 / 1k | 8.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 21.0/100 | 66.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 122 | 69 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 5 |
| Green cover | 9.6% | 12.6% |
| Population | 1,827 | 3,210 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Forrest is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Hughes is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Forrest pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Hughes is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hughes, while Forrest remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.