Forrestdale vs Haynes, WA Suburb Comparison

Forrestdale for retirees and families; Haynes for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForrestdaleHaynes

Overall score

Forrestdale

48.7/100

Haynes

32.1/100

Crime rate

Forrestdale

60.1 / 1k

Haynes

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forrestdale

56

Haynes

25

Population

Forrestdale

1,027

Haynes

2,417

Metric leadForrestdale 5Haynes 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForrestdaleHaynes
Overall score48.7/10032.1/100
Housing (desirability)32.3/10046.5/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves82
Public transport stops1116
Walkability20.5/10024.0/100
Nearby amenities5625
Green cover12.6%2.1%
Population1,0272,417
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Forrestdale is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Haynes is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Forrestdale sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Haynes is further out with more breathing room.

Forrestdale pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Haynes is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Forrestdale suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Haynes is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons