Overall score
Freshwater
45.4/100
Kamerunga
34.2/100
Freshwater vs Kamerunga, QLD suburb comparison
Freshwater for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
FreshwaterKamerunga
Crime rate
Freshwater
145.7 / 1k
Kamerunga
145.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Freshwater
41
Kamerunga
7
Population
Freshwater
2,142
Kamerunga
962
Metric leadFreshwater 7Kamerunga 01 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for investmentFreshwater
- Best for best valueFreshwater
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Freshwater | Kamerunga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.4/100 | 34.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.9/100 | 62.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 145.7 / 1k | 145.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Walkability | 43.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 41 | 7 |
| Population | 2,142 | 962 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Freshwater is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Kamerunga is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Freshwater tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Kamerunga stands out for a country-town feel. On housing, Freshwater sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Kamerunga.
Freshwater suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Kamerunga is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.