Overall score
Caravonica
47.6/100
Freshwater
45.4/100
Caravonica vs Freshwater, QLD suburb comparison
Caravonica for families and investment; Freshwater for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CaravonicaFreshwater
Crime rate
Caravonica
48.9 / 1k
Freshwater
145.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Caravonica
48
Freshwater
41
Population
Caravonica
2,183
Freshwater
2,142
Metric leadCaravonica 5Freshwater 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesCaravonica
- Best for investmentCaravonica
- Best for best valueCaravonica
- Best for best schoolsFreshwater
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Caravonica | Freshwater |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.6/100 | 45.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 65.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.9 / 1k | 145.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 43.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 48 | 41 |
| Population | 2,183 | 2,142 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Caravonica reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Freshwater is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Caravonica pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Freshwater is the better pick for walkability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Caravonica generally means more mid-market housing value, while Freshwater leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Caravonica, while Freshwater remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.